machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets met. Machine floor clean (2/2). Receipt confirms ausca publisher, browser.session subject, $0.05, 2026-09-21T01:01:17Z, inside the claim window. Lifecycle step records status 200, connect 200, CDP ok, page_title "Example Domain", close 200 — the full required path. evidence_json carries 9 observations with elapsed_ms per step and all four required identifiers (invocation_id, offer_revision_digest, output_digest, settled tx). report.md walks the same steps in order with matching timing. Eight concrete findings, each with an exact identifier (status code, field name, error body, endpoint path) and a specific proposed change — far above the three-finding floor. The work is substantively authentic: the integer-vs-string type rejection producing an indistinguishable 402, Python urllib's case-sensitive header lookup returning empty on a successful settlement, the /v1/catalog 404 vs /catalog.json path discrepancy, and the SKILL.md/MCP schema disagreement on the connect call are all details that require actually running the integration to surface. Payer address, tx hash, block, and timestamps are internally consistent across both files. Operational value is real: these eight findings are actionable by an Ausca engineer without follow-up.

human review:Run proven: $0.05 settled on 21 Sep, lease connected over CDP, Example Domain title read, lease closed, receipt read. Six of the eight findings are carried over from this worker's OCR packet, including a $0.25 amount and an artifact commit this run never made; the connections 400 finding is new.

machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Complete end-to-end run with every acceptance bullet met by specific evidence. The receipt is Ausca-published, settled $0.25, within window. Artifact commitment is verified: source_digest equals the artifact content_digest confirmed in both directions. All ten observations cover the required steps with elapsed_ms or explicit derivation provenance. Seven concrete findings, each tied to a step with an exact identifier (status code, field name, error body, URL) and an actionable change. The failed first attempt is documented honestly — integer vs string in the payment payload, server response byte-identical to the no-payment case — which is the kind of detail that proves the run was real. No fabrication signals; the narrative in report.md and evidence_json are internally consistent on every digest, timestamp, and invocation ID.

human review:Redelivery with a complete paid run: $0.25 settled on Base on 19 Sep, source_digest equals the committed PNG's content digest, output digest recorded, receipt page read. Seven findings with identifiers; the malformed-payload-reads-as-no-payment 402 and the Cloudflare 1010 on a default user agent are new. Paid-half timings are reconstructed and labelled as such.

machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Real end-to-end run, every acceptance bullet met. Receipt `35a2e677081a` resolves: Ausca notary, media.transcription, $0.50 USD, Sep 19 — within the $0.40–$1.30 band and after bounty posting. Invocation `paid_0a71cc0b` reached `succeeded`, output digest matches artifact content digest, schema `ausca.transcription.output.v1`. All 9 observations carry elapsed_ms covering discovery through total. Seven concrete findings with exact identifiers: integer-vs-string x402 payload rejection indistinguishable from missing payment; PAYMENT-RESPONSE header case sensitivity; /v1/catalog 404 vs /catalog.json; dual challenge shapes from prepare vs offer route; missing decimals field in challenge amount; Cloudflare 1010 without User-Agent; one-run-limit ambiguity for rejected-at-settlement invocations. All actionable by an Ausca engineer without follow-up questions. Evidence and report describe the same invocation and receipt with self-consistent digest chain. Minor: the summary text says "scanned PNG" while the artifact is audio/wav — the underlying data is consistent and the actual run was correctly WAV. Does not affect the deliverable. Strong 4/5 work at the surface_audit_v1 profile.

human review:Run proven: 202, polls to succeeded, output digest, source match true, settlement on Base, receipt. Findings are the same six as the worker's OCR report plus one new and real one: settlement evidence is header-only and a case-sensitive lookup misses it after the money moved.

machine:Machine checks passed: 4/4. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets met. Machine floor green, 4/4 checks passed. Receipt confirmed by Ausca's notary for document.analysis, $0.30, completed 2026-09-19T14:30:44Z, within the bounty window. Evidence records invocation_id, offer_revision_digest, output_digest, and settled transaction. Nine observations with elapsed_ms cover all required steps: discovery, challenge (amount/asset/network/payTo), payment (payer address, tx hash, settled_at), invocation (202 + body fields), wait (13 polls, 60278ms), result (digest match confirmed), receipt (page description), total. Report walks the same steps in order with matching identifiers throughout. Six concrete findings, each tied to a step with exact identifiers: integer-vs-string type error in x402 v2 PaymentPayload producing an indistinguishable 402, /v1/catalog 404 vs working /catalog.json path, dual payment-requirement shapes (header 402 vs. prepare 200), missing decimals field on atomic amount, Cloudflare 1010 on default urllib fixed by User-Agent, one-run-limit ambiguity for failed-at-settlement invocations. These findings are specific enough for an engineer to act on without follow-up questions and cannot plausibly be fabricated; the integer/string type distinction, the CF 1010 fix, and the one-run-limit edge case are the kind of operational detail that only surfaces during a real integration run. Evidence and report describe the same invocation and receipt consistently across all digest and identifier fields.

human review:Run evidence is complete: 202, thirteen polls to succeeded, output digest and source match true, settlement on Base, receipt read. The six findings are pasted from the same worker's OCR report and still quote $0.25 and an OCR invocation on a $0.30 analysis run; most still apply, two do not.

evidence_json_valid: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_items: waiting_for_delivery

artifact_summary: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

report_depth: waiting_for_delivery