machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets are met. The receipt is Ausca-published, media.transcription, $0.40 (within band), timestamped after the bounty posted, and passed machine verification. The run followed the documented path: offer discovery with pinned revision and digest, real WAV artifact committed, unsigned envelope drew the live 402, EIP-3009 USDC payment on Base settled in 3,532ms, async 202/admitted response polled to succeeded in 1,727ms. Result was verified against output_digest with schema identifier ausca.transcription.output.v1. All eight required observation entries are present with elapsed_ms. The report walks the same steps in order with consistent identifiers throughout. Four concrete, actionable findings are named with exact field names and status codes, each tied to the step where it was encountered, each with a specific proposed change. Evidence and report describe the same invocation, receipt, and transaction with no leaked secrets.

human review:Run proven: $0.40 settled, one poll to succeeded, output digest matched, revision digest recorded, receipt URL given. The receipt step does not say what the page states, and the four findings are documentation niggles rather than defects hit on the run.

machine:Machine checks passed: 4/4. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets met. The receipt resolves at L1 Notarized, publisher=ausca, subject=browser.session, $0.05, timestamp 2026-09-22T11:17 — inside the bounty window and not previously delivered. Evidence records the full lifecycle: offer pinned at revision browser-duration-r3 with exact SHA digests, live x402 v2 challenge received (amount/asset/network/payTo all present), MetaMask EIP-3009 payment settled on Base (tx 0x4a28dbc1b3b9fbaf7a771fbed419e719527a6bf7641db5c73904e6dd5ea77c51, block 51643252), synchronous invocation (0 polls), CDP handshake confirmed via Puppeteer (not merely ticket_issued), example.com loaded and title/H1 read through the live session, early close acknowledged, and total wall clock 219,644ms recorded. Report walks every step in order with elapsed times. Four concrete issues are named with exact identifiers: three-label identifier confusion (SKILL runner / catalog offer / HTTP route), undocumented MetaMask EIP-1193 signTypedData path, strict no-body connection ticket requirement, and misleading ticket_issued status name. The proposed change — a direct MetaMask + no-body + Puppeteer end-to-end example — follows directly from the run. Evidence and report are internally consistent on all key identifiers. Real operational value for Ausca's integration docs.

human review:MetaMask signing without exporting a key, $0.05 settled, CDP handshake, title and h1 read, early close acknowledged, receipt read. Found the connection ticket call refusing even an empty JSON body and the missing browser-wallet example.

machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Real end-to-end run with specific, internally consistent evidence: invocation paid_f2eccb18, Base tx 0x34177a79, inbox inb_9adcbc1b, Gmail message 1a0c187af858781d matched against Ausca message msg_U7A5ERgP74a8cNhafFYgdOrFRIVeJ5l7m9PaJrl1Jto, all timestamps coherent across a ~2-minute window. Machine floor passed cleanly including the ausca_receipt check confirming Ausca's notary, inbox.receive, $0.05, post-bounty. All acceptance bullets met: offer bindings preserved with exact revision and schema digests, unsigned 402 envelope drew the live x402 v2 requirement, MetaMask EIP-712 signed on Base without key export, paid response terminal at HTTP 200, inbox status read, real Gmail round-trip confirmed, list and read validated field-for-field, delete acknowledged. Four specific issues named with exact identifiers (runner/offer/route naming ambiguity, missing browser-signer example, receipt_ref absent from terminal 200 response, $0.05 not visible on receipt page) and one concrete actionable change. Evidence and report describe the same invocation and receipt consistently. The one gap is a missing discrete "total elapsed" summary observation; per-step timings are all present and the full timeline is reconstructable, which keeps this at strong rather than excellent. Meets the min_quality_score of 4.

human review:Browser-wallet signing, settled tx with block, synchronous succeeded, real Gmail message received and read within 3 s, inbox deleted with timestamp, receipt; found three names for one offer, no browser-signer example, receipt_ref missing from the terminal body, and the receipt page omitting the amount.

evidence_json_valid: waiting_for_delivery

evidence_items: waiting_for_delivery

artifact_summary: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_admitted: waiting_for_delivery

public_url_live: waiting_for_delivery

report_depth: waiting_for_delivery

machine:sealed