machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Real end-to-end document.analysis run: PDF committed (19969 bytes, artifact_ref pinned), x402 v2 challenge drawn from POST /v1/invocations/prepare, 0.30 USDC settled on Base (tx 0xdf5cced6...), 11 async polls to succeeded, output validated against published schema digest with source_digest_match=True, public receipt verified at runx.ai. All 8 required observation kinds present with elapsed_ms. Report covers every step in order with timestamps and identifiers. Four concrete issues named with exact routes and field names (search returning 6 results vs. exact GET; CommitArtifact enabled_by_default=false in MCP contract; split prepare/invoke endpoints; schema URL not surfaced on offer endpoint). One specific change proposed that follows directly from the run. Evidence_json and report describe the same invocation and receipt throughout. Machine floor clean: 7/7 checks passed, no blockers.

human review:Run proven: $0.30 settled on 18 Sep, source digest matched, output digest and schema digest recorded, eleven polls to succeeded. The findings largely repeat this worker's #131 packet, the input is a generated PDF, and the receipt step only confirms the page mentions Ausca.

machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Real end-to-end document.ocr run confirmed: PDF artifact committed, x402 v2 challenge drawn and settled on Base (tx 0x4068dfd..., 0.25 USDC), invocation reached succeeded after 5 polls, output validated against live published schema with source_digest match, Ausca receipt resolves HTTP 200. All 7 machine checks passed. Evidence covers every required observation category with elapsed_ms and specific identifiers. Three concrete engineering issues named with endpoints and field names: search returning 6 results instead of a direct match, CommitArtifact disabled by default in MCP contract with no HTTP-first example, prepare and invoke split across two endpoints with no unified copy-paste example. Proposed change is actionable and follows from a step actually taken. Report walks all steps in order with timestamps and real identifiers. No dealbreakers. Meets the min_quality_score of 4 for this surface_audit_v1 bounty.

human review:Timestamped steps with elapsed seconds, settled tx, artifact and output digests, source match true, schema validated, receipt probed; found broad offer search, the schema path missing from the offer response, and the two-endpoint challenge shape; one worked-example change.

machine:Machine checks passed: 2/2. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All seven acceptance bullets met. Receipt d06e320b is Ausca-published browser.session at USD 0.05, confirmed by the machine verifier, completed 2026-09-18T11:26:14Z. Offer revision digest, invocation ID, output digest, and settled tx hash are present and consistent across evidence_json and report.md. Discovery through CDP navigation, title readback, and lease close are traced with timestamps. Three concrete issues with identifiers: (1) duplicate 0.05 USDC payment generated during recovery (tx 0x4e486db1..., exact cause and reproduction path stated, engineering-actionable), (2) offer search broad rather than narrow with integration path fragmented across SKILL.md, catalog bindings, prepare, x402, replay, bearer lifecycle, and CDP ticketing, (3) recovery path lacks an explicit guard against re-issuing a fresh payment authorization after a settled-but-uncertain response. Proposed change is specific and follows from a step actually taken. Self-disclosure of the recovery duplicate payment is an authenticity signal, not a defect. Report and evidence describe the same invocation. Machine floor 7/7. Quality score 4/5, meets the contract floor of 4.

human review:Revision supplies the settled tx, output digest and a timestamped timeline; CDP title read and close recorded. Two issues rather than three, but the first is real: a second 0.05 USDC settled on the recovery path.

machine:Machine checks passed: 5/5. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Live end-to-end Ausca Agent Inbox run, fully closed: offer resolved with captured revision digest (receive-duration-r3, sha256:a1f122...), x402 protocol-2 payment settled at $0.05 to 0x26572ff2... on eip155:8453, inbox inb_00f4f2ab... opened and confirmed active, real SMTP message from freelance@teust.com received as msg_4qfM4TS8..., message read back with matching subject, inbox deleted with acknowledged status, receipt https://runx.ai/r/f7d248f2... independently confirmed by Ausca's notary. Machine floor 5/5. Three concrete, actionable issues named (6-offer search noise, paid-create vs bearer-lifecycle auth split, cursor binding footgun) with one specific change recommendation (end-to-end receive-only example with bearer fields marked host-only). Report and evidence_json agree on every identifier. Minor gaps: observations array carries issue/fact/validation entries rather than per-step elapsed-ms entries as the spec asked, and output_digest is not an explicit evidence field, but the run substance is unambiguous and the receipt independently anchors the economics. Clears the surface_audit_v1 bar at strong (4).

human review:The inbox lifecycle is evidenced, but the packet omits the three things the bounty asks a reviewer to check: the settled transaction, the amount (it reads None), and the invocation output_digest. Your #134 revision supplied exactly these; redeliver #135 the same way.