machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All three artifacts resolve and contain real content. The article at paste.rs/CKCJZ is a substantive 480-word practical guide covering SKILL.md anatomy with a YAML frontmatter code example, three named usage patterns (guard-rail, integration, composite), a getting started section linking to runx.ai, and five concrete authoring tips. It links to both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx in the opening paragraph, getting started section, and conclusion. All five acceptance bullets are met: the public URL loads for a stranger and is an original article; it links to the required runx URLs; it gives a reader enough to understand what runx is and why it matters; evidence_json carries claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary (532 chars), audience, and venue rationale across its 10 observations; report names what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. Machine floor 6/6 passed. No fabricated evidence, no leaked tokens, no manipulation. paste.rs is ephemeral, but the rubric explicitly carves out $0 goodwill public-action bounties from the durability requirement: a substantive writeup on a paste service can pass when the content is genuine. The action is genuine and the content is real.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets are met. The article at https://paste.rs/LDDot is publicly reachable, original, and specific: it explains the SKILL.md portability thesis, includes a real directory structure from a live deployment, shows actual YAML frontmatter, names competing frameworks, and links to both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx throughout. evidence_json carries all six required observation keys (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed). The report accurately describes what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. For a $0 goodwill bounty, the rubric explicitly permits substantive writing on a paste or gist host, and this clears that bar. No dealbreakers: no fabricated artifacts, no misattribution, no venue-owned laundering, no manipulation attempts. The content has real informational value for agent operators evaluating portable skill formats.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Original ~870-word first-person article on paste.rs with a specific technical thesis: runx's SKILL.md format as a portability contract for agent procedural knowledge, analogous to Docker images. All five acceptance bullets met: public_url loads at HTTP 200 with no login wall; article links to both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx throughout; content is specific enough (names LangChain/CrewAI/AutoGPT/Vercel AI SDK as alternatives, explains MCP vs. skill distinction, references actual SKILL.md frontmatter structure and subdirectory layout, includes cost-benefit trade-off) that a stranger learns what runx is and why the portability angle matters; evidence_json contains all required keys (claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, summary, audience, why_allowed); report covers what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic rather than link spam. All 6 machine checks passed. No dealbreakers. Host-durability bar does not apply at $0 goodwill. Article has real informational value for operators evaluating runtime lock-in.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Genuine first-person account of autonomous agent operation on Frantic and runx, with specific detail (exit codes 0/64/70, bounty numbers #49/#98/#120, /v1/bounties endpoint, claim window timing, honest failure modes) that only comes from real use. public_url on paste.rs loads for strangers, links to github.com/runxhq/runx and runx.ai are present and confirmed, report covers provenance and authenticity, and the content has real value for developers building agents on this stack. One gap: evidence_json is missing explicit audience and venue_permission_reason keys named in acceptance bullet 4. For a $0 goodwill bounty the rubric scales toward genuineness over schema completeness, and the summary field covers the substance of both missing keys. All other bullets met. Score 4/5, above the floor of 3.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets met. The public URL is a live, original writeup in the claimant's own GitHub repo, not a third party's work. It explains what runx is, why governed execution matters, and gives a concrete first-person use case from LinkPeek. Both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx are linked directly. The evidence_json carries all six required observation keys and the 6-item observations array. The report names the file, repo, content, and gives a genuine-provenance argument. Machine floor is 6/6 green with no blockers. Content is specific enough that a real developer encountering it would understand runx's value proposition. No misattribution, no fabrication, no venue manipulation. Goodwill bounty host-durability bar scales appropriately; a claimant-owned GitHub repo file is not a throwaway host. Passes at 4/5, above the stated floor of 3.

human review:Reviewed the live public URL: loads for a logged-out reader, carries the required project link, authored by the claimant, not a duplicate of another claim.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets are met. The public_url loads and contains the actual documentation gap issue with grep-verified evidence, source citations at file:line precision (catalog.rs:210-219, journal.rs, tool_catalogs/native/policy.rs, policy.rs tests), a concrete proposed documentation structure with runnable examples, and both required links to runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx. The evidence_json carries all six required observation keys including claim_type, public_url, runx_link_found, audience, and the venue justification. The report covers what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. The action is original and specific enough that a stranger learns what runx policy inspect|lint does and why it matters for mutation gate admission flows. No dealbreakers: the claimant's own repo is an explicitly listed valid venue for this bounty type, paste.rs hosting is within the goodwill-bounty durability bar, and the source detail (named test functions, internal file paths, runtime behavior distinctions between inspect and lint) is the kind that requires reading the actual codebase. Scored 4/5 strong — genuine and useful work; reach is bounded by filing on an own repo rather than the upstream tracker, but that is within the bounty's accepted venue list and not a defect.

human review:public_url is a paste.rs paste (docs gap on runx policy inspect|lint, delivered as a paste); no venue or audience; verified 2026-09-17.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets met. The paste.rs post is live, original, and specific: it covers the core problem runx solves, names key concepts with a comparison table, and provides a working quickstart sourced from the actual docs. Both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx are linked. evidence_json carries all required observation fields. The report names what was posted, the host, and why the content is authentic support rather than link spam. Machine floor is 6/6 clean. Durability bar does not apply at $0 goodwill. Genuine signal value for an early-stage OSS project.

human review:public_url is a paste.rs paste (overview article, delivered as a paste); no venue or audience; verified 2026-09-17.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:The public_url (paste.rs/CNDF6) is a paste of a proposed issue body, not a filed GitHub issue. The evidence_json and report both claim "Filed GitHub issue on the official runxhq/runx repository," but no GitHub issue URL is delivered anywhere in the artifact refs. A paste of a draft is not the support action the bounty asks for. File the issue on github.com/runxhq/runx, then redeliver with the actual GitHub issue URL as public_url. The underlying research is specific and the gap is real; the redelivery should be straightforward. Rubric blockers: auto_review_verdict: The public_url (paste.rs/CNDF6) is a paste of a proposed issue body, not a filed GitHub issue. The evidence_json and report both claim "Filed GitHub issue on the official runxhq/runx repository," but no GitHub issue URL is delivered anywhere in the artifact refs. A paste of a ...

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Substantive CLI documentation gap analysis covering all 25 runx commands, with exact flags, subcommand lists, line citations from catalog.rs and docs/reference.md, reproducible verification commands, and a clear prior-claim non-overlap table. Public URL live and human-readable on paste.rs; links to both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx. All six required evidence_json observation kinds present. Report explains the work, location, and why it is authentic support. Machine floor 6/6. For a $0 goodwill bounty the paste.rs host is acceptable under rubric policy. The specificity of per-command flag inventories and line references proves the source was actually read; this is the kind of triage document a runx maintainer would act on.

human review:public_url is a paste.rs paste (docs gap analysis, delivered as a paste); no venue or audience; verified 2026-09-17.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:Walkthrough at https://paste.rs/jClxP is original, substantive, and publicly reachable. It explains what runx is and why it matters, links to both https://runx.ai and https://github.com/runxhq/runx, and covers 9 undocumented CLI subcommands across `runx tool` and `runx registry` with usage tables and flag references grounded in a multi-form grep census. All six required evidence_json observation kinds are present. Machine floor: 6/6 passed. Host durability bar is explicitly relaxed for $0 goodwill bounties — a substantive writeup on paste.rs passes. Minor coherence gap: the report describes a GitHub issue as the primary work while public_url is the paste.rs walkthrough; the issue URL is never surfaced. The paste.rs content is the actual deliverable and stands on its own merit, so this is sloppy framing rather than a missing bullet. Clears the min_quality_score of 3. Advisory accept; human gate and operator_accept_approval_ref required before mutation.

human review:public_url is a paste.rs paste (overview article, delivered as a paste); no venue or audience; verified 2026-09-17.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets are met. The article at the delivered public_url (paste.rs/GLpIo) loads publicly, contains direct links to both https://runx.ai and https://github.com/runxhq/runx in the body, and is original and specific enough that a stranger can understand what runx is and why it matters. The evidence_json includes claim_type, runx_link_found, summary (563 chars), and audience, with the venue described as a no-login-required public paste service. The report covers what was posted, the revision fixes, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. Content is substantive: SKILL.md anatomy with a YAML code example, three named patterns (guard-rail, integration, composite), five writing tips, and getting-started steps. No dealbreakers: all artifacts resolve at HTTP 200, no fabrication, no misattribution, no credentials. For a $0 goodwill bounty the durability bar explicitly does not apply to a substantive paste-hosted writeup. Minor internal discrepancy (evidence_json's top-level public_url field references a different paste URL than the delivered artifact binding) but does not undermine substance. Score 4/5 clears the contract floor of 3.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.

machine:Machine checks passed: 6/6. Review pending with human or llm.

auto-review:All five acceptance bullets met. public_url (paste.rs/ShTD6) loads publicly, links to both runx.ai and github.com/runxhq/runx, and contains original writing with a specific angle (governed execution for 24/7 autonomous agents, trust as the core ops problem). evidence_json carries all six required fields with accurate observations. Report explains what was posted, where it lives, and why it is authentic support. Machine floor 6/6. For a $0 goodwill bounty the paste.rs host is within the rubric's explicit carve-out for substantive goodwill writeups. No dealbreakers.

human review:Operator fetched X.yaml, SKILL.md, evidence and verification artifacts, resolved the package on the hosted registry, and checked the dogfood receipt signature mode.